tkowalewski/assistor scored 44/100 on Slopicide
44/100
Cyborg
Part human, part autocomplete. Hard to tell where one ends.
Only 3 files here worth judging, so take this one with extra salt.
What stood out
How strongly each pattern showed up overall, and in how many of the files.
- Defensive everything1/3 files · 32%
Blanket try/catch, log-and-rethrow, impossible null checks.
- Boilerplate padding2/3 files · 32%
More lines, wrappers and ceremony than the job needs.
- Copy-paste repetition1/3 files · 29%
Near-duplicate blocks with small edits instead of a shared helper.
Human fingerprints
- Pragmatic shortcuts3/3 files · 41%
Terse idioms and deliberate omissions an experienced author takes.
- Domain-specific naming1/3 files · 28%
Names that show deep familiarity with the problem.
Files we looked at
The files behind the score, sloppiest first.
- lib/assistor/assistant_group.rb60out of 100
Ruby · 813 B
- Boilerplate padding 36%
- Copy-paste repetition 33%
- lib/assistor/daemon.rb42out of 100
Ruby · 2.3 KB
- Defensive everything 36%
- Boilerplate padding 31%
- lib/assistor/assistant.rb33out of 100
Ruby · 1.8 KB
Scanned Oct 31, 2026 from master. A playful gut check, not a verdict on the people behind the code. How scoring works. More recent reports.