lxc/incus-compose@095c46c

lxc/incus-compose scored 10/100 on Slopicide

10/100

Handcrafted

Artisanal, small-batch code. A human clearly sweated over this.

Post on X

What stood out

How strongly each pattern showed up overall, and in how many of the files.

  • Copy-paste repetition4/8 files · 30%

    Near-duplicate blocks with small edits instead of a shared helper.

  • Boilerplate padding1/8 files · 22%

    More lines, wrappers and ceremony than the job needs.

  • Unused or phantom imports1/8 files · 21%

    Imports that are never used, or calls to APIs that don't seem to exist.

  • Defensive everything1/8 files · 7%

    Blanket try/catch, log-and-rethrow, impossible null checks.

Human fingerprints

  • Domain-specific naming8/8 files · 63%

    Names that show deep familiarity with the problem.

  • Pragmatic shortcuts8/8 files · 41%

    Terse idioms and deliberate omissions an experienced author takes.

  • Lived-in code5/8 files · 39%

    Idiosyncrasies and quirks of code that evolved over time.

  • Comments explain why5/8 files · 35%

    Comments about trade-offs, gotchas, bugs and workarounds.

Files we looked at

The files behind the score, sloppiest first.

Scan another repo

Scanned Oct 30, 2026 from develop. A playful gut check, not a verdict on the people behind the code. How scoring works. More recent reports.