open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation scored 11/100 on Slopicide
Handcrafted
Artisanal, small-batch code. A human clearly sweated over this.
What stood out
How strongly each pattern showed up overall, and in how many of the files.
- Copy-paste repetition4/8 files · 30%
Near-duplicate blocks with small edits instead of a shared helper.
- Unused or phantom imports1/8 files · 25%
Imports that are never used, or calls to APIs that don't seem to exist.
- Boilerplate padding1/8 files · 19%
More lines, wrappers and ceremony than the job needs.
- Assistant tells1/8 files · 12%
Emoji in logs, 'in a real application…', placeholder TODOs.
Human fingerprints
- Domain-specific naming8/8 files · 66%
Names that show deep familiarity with the problem.
- Pragmatic shortcuts7/8 files · 41%
Terse idioms and deliberate omissions an experienced author takes.
- Lived-in code5/8 files · 39%
Idiosyncrasies and quirks of code that evolved over time.
- Comments explain why1/8 files · 21%
Comments about trade-offs, gotchas, bugs and workarounds.
Files we looked at
The files behind the score, sloppiest first.
C · 1.5 KB
- Unused or phantom imports 31%
- Boilerplate padding 30%
- internal/test/integration/cloud_gcp_test.go17out of 100
Go · 4.1 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 34%
JavaScript · 6.3 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 33%
- pkg/export/prom/prom.go15out of 100
Go · 89 KB
- Assistant tells 65%
- pkg/export/otel/otelcfg/common.go8out of 100
Go · 19 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 40%
- pkg/appolly/app/request/span.go4out of 100
Go · 88 KB
- pkg/internal/ebpf/gotracer/gotracer.go1out of 100
Go · 84 KB
- pkg/ebpf/common/http_transform.go0out of 100
Go · 21 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 39%
Scanned Oct 26, 2026 from main. A playful gut check, not a verdict on the people behind the code. How scoring works. More recent reports.