ZallaxDev/emerald-3ds scored 7/100 on Slopicide
Handcrafted
Artisanal, small-batch code. A human clearly sweated over this.
What stood out
How strongly each pattern showed up overall, and in how many of the files.
- Copy-paste repetition4/8 files · 30%
Near-duplicate blocks with small edits instead of a shared helper.
- Boilerplate padding1/8 files · 20%
More lines, wrappers and ceremony than the job needs.
- Defensive everything1/8 files · 7%
Blanket try/catch, log-and-rethrow, impossible null checks.
Human fingerprints
- Domain-specific naming8/8 files · 69%
Names that show deep familiarity with the problem.
- Lived-in code7/8 files · 43%
Idiosyncrasies and quirks of code that evolved over time.
- Pragmatic shortcuts7/8 files · 40%
Terse idioms and deliberate omissions an experienced author takes.
- Comments explain why4/8 files · 33%
Comments about trade-offs, gotchas, bugs and workarounds.
Files we looked at
The files behind the score, sloppiest first.
- builder/emerald3ds_builder/followers_sources.py31out of 100
Python · 100 KB
- 3ds_port/src/voxel/voxel_grade.h16out of 100
C · 793 B
- Boilerplate padding 33%
- 3ds_port/src/3ds_icons_ptbr.c4out of 100
C · 45 KB
- 3ds_port/scripts/voxel_bridge.py3out of 100
Python · 118 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 33%
- builder/tests/test_variant_payload.py1out of 100
Python · 13 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 32%
- builder/emerald3ds_builder/install.py1out of 100
Python · 13 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 41%
- Defensive everything 34%
- 3ds_port/src/voxel/voxel_mesh_builder.c0out of 100
C · 123 KB
- Copy-paste repetition 33%
- tools/localize_german.py0out of 100
Python · 13 KB
Scanned Nov 2, 2026 from main. A playful gut check, not a verdict on the people behind the code. How scoring works. More recent reports.